Today, I learned that the SB277 referendum was sabotaged. In case you've been living under a rock, SB277 is the law that mandates forced vaccinations for all children in California in order for them to attend school. Read more about it here.
Everyone should be outraged by this law, unfortunately "pro-vaxxers" saw it as a way to get everyone else to conform to their way of thinking instead of realizing the magnitude of the government removing a civil liberty. By the way, it is illegal to interfere with recall and referendum activities. Hopefully the guilty parties will be caught and charged.
The wording of this law is such that any vaccine the government deems necessary for school attendance in the future will have to be administered. Currently, the vaccine list includes MMR, chicken pox, tetanus, Hepatitis B, just to name a few. The rest are in the link posted above.
Let's pretend a family is fine with the standard childhood vaccines, but feels the HPV vaccine, or perhaps the flu vaccine, isn't right for them. Under SB277, if the future government says every child MUST have the Gardisil shot, or a flu shot, or both (or any other vaccines they deem necessary and there are currently 271 new ones in development), in order to attend school, the choice for that family to reject both of those vaccines is now removed.
The law says kids who are homeschooled do not have to get any vaccines. It also says medical exemptions can be applied in order to remain in public schools. The problem is, many families cannot afford to have a parent stay home to educate the children and medical exemptions are nearly impossible to obtain even after children suffer horrifying reactions to the vaccines. The California Constitution says it is the right of every citizen to have a free public education. SB277 removes this right, which means it is not constitutional.
It is also in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
The Nuremberg Code was enacted at the end of WWII. It stipulates, and I quote,
"1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision."
"7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. "
Vaccine injury is skyrocketing due to the sheer amounts of shots our children must receive according to the CDC schedule. Our government removed the ability to sue pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries in 1982, and there have been no safety studies performed to ensure the ingredients in vaccines will not harm anyone, which means, basically, vaccines are experimental. Read the Nuremberg Code portion of this post again.
Think about how often you have taken your kids to the doctor for a shot, and how often the doctor has allowed you to read the vaccine insert before administering the injection. I can tell you I've never actually seen one in person, nor was I told of possible side effects, except the children might "be a bit more fussy than usual." When my children had reactions to the vaccines, the doctors said the reactions were "coincidence". I cannot tell you how many videos I have watched, and how many accounts I have read where parents were told the same thing, and their children, tragically, had more adverse reactions than mine did.
To compensate these parents whose children suffered terribly, life-alertingly, after vaccines, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created. Since its inception, over $1 billion has been paid. If vaccines are safe, why has so much money been dispensed? Sadly, anyone who participates in this program is slapped with a gag order. This helps ensure that the mythology surrounding the safety of vaccines remains in place. Adding insult to (vaccine) injury, the cases take, sometimes, years to be resolved, which is in violation of American civil liberties because it denies due process.
Parents are right to question the safety of vaccines. Many parents, dismissively labeled, "anti-vax," or "pro-disease," are not actually against the idea of vaccinations at all. They simply want assurance that what medical professionals inject into their children is safe. There is nothing wrong with questioning and wanting accountability! Please see the Nuremberg Code portion again. The problem is, the CDC and the AMA, including Dr. Richard Pan, the creator of SB277, have all gone on record as saying vaccines are safe, and that they do not cause autism, nor autism spectrum disorders. They have spent lots of money trying to "prove" autism is 100% genetic.
Unfortunately, they have never actually performed safety tests. Things like motorcycle helmets and seat belts undergo safety testing, and they can be removed, so while laws are in place saying everyone needs to use them, they are still a choice. Once injected, a shot cannot be removed, so it should undergo the most rigorous of safety tests, and yet, it hasn't.
Speaking of safety and the CDC, you heard about what they did, right? Taking evidence that vaccines cause autism and throwing it into the garbage can? Never mind the safety of millions of children is at risk, they took what they had, and instead of saying, "Wait a minute, we need to change these ingredients and change the schedules to ensure everyone's safety," they just tossed it all and covered it up.
Let us examine the ingredients of common childhood vaccines. Ready? Aluminum sulfate, bovine tissues, human diploid tissues (tissues from aborted babies---look to the Planned Parenthood videos and scandals for more information on that), calf serum, MSG, formaldehyde, monkey kidney cells, phenol, thimerosal, chick kidney cells, egg albumin, fetal bovine serum, just to name a few. There are lots of other ingredients, too, that mere humans cannot pronounce.
Here is an article from a chemist about why he doesn't vaccinate his kids. It's worth reading.
Vegans are often against vaccines due to the animal cells. Religious people are often against vaccines due to the tissues from aborted babies. And who wouldn't be? Would anyone really feel great about injecting the cells of a dead baby into their own, brand new, sweet, innocent gift from God? Because of the objectionable ingredients, parents should have the choice as to whether or not to inject them into their children. It should never be a mandate.
Parents should also have the right to discuss a vaccination schedule with their pediatricians and decide a shot schedule based on individual medical histories. SB277 removes this right, as well, forcing everyone to adhere to the CDC schedule, or else. Due to individual physiology, vaccines should never be administered in a "one-size-fits-all" method, and yet, they are. How unfortunate, Dr. Richard Pan didn't take this into consideration when he drafted the bill. As a doctor, he should have known better.
Pro-vaxxers say that anti-vaxxers should not have the right to make the pro-vax kids sick by not vaccinating. Well, if their kids are vaccinated, that means they are safe from disease, right? People do not generally carry around germs for things like whooping cough or polio. In fact, those who are freshly vaccinated against those things are actually more of a danger to those who are immunocompromised. Some vaccines shed for a month! This means the newly vaccinated person is a walking incubator and spreader of disease.
"Well, that's where herd immunity comes in," the pro-vaxxers say. Herd immunity is a myth. Dr. Blaylock can explain it better:
That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.
If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.
When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.
- See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/#sthash.KREGpS6X.dpuf
Have you heard about the "outbreaks" of disease recently? Things like whooping cough and measles? Guess what? Every person who had the diseases had been vaccinated for them. Guess what else? No one died. Another truth--the outbreaks consisted of very few people. The Disneyland measles outbreak had a ripple effect that included 147 people across 7 states. How many millions of people live in those 7 states combined? I'd say it's hardly an outbreak or an epidemic that 147 people were affected. And again, no one died.
Supposedly, SB277 was enacted because California was below the 92% or 93% vaccination rate needed to ensure the mythological 'herd immunity'. The truth is, 97% of California's children were vaccinated, making this law completely unnecessary.
Also, a good chunk of Californians supposedly felt the government needs to stay out of everyone's medical business. Did this poll strike fear in lawmakers and Big Pharma? Possibly, but it's hard to say.
Let's get back to the point of this post. There was a movement to get SB277 on the ballot in November, 2016 so everyone could vote on it. Without it being on the ballot, it will go into law in July, 2016. As I said before, regardless of where anyone stands on the idea of vaccines, people should be up in arms over this bill. As I said earlier, it removes the choice of parents to decide what it best for their own families if they want their kids to remain in public schools. It removes the choice of parents to decide which vaccines they feel are safe, and which they would like to avoid. Pro-vaxxers insist everyone needs to get all the vaccines all the time, however, if someone has a family history of being allergic to eggs, for example, it is best to avoid shots that contain egg albumin and egg protein, but as I said, obtaining medical exemptions can be nearly impossible, and SB277 removes the rights of parents to choose a schedule with their pediatricians.
SB277 sets a precedent for the rest of the nation, so California's struggle will soon be everyone else's struggle. Pro-vaxxers were so enmeshed in spreading their hate of people who do not vaccinate, they forgot to read the fine print. They didn't see the forest for the trees. This is about freedom in America, and it would have been nice to have their signatures on these ballots. They don't realize what they've done to themselves, their children, and future generations.
What has happened is that there were signed petitions that were turned in with the front pages ripped off. This invalidates the signatures on the petitions. Other petitions have gone completely missing. If pro-vaxxers would have climbed down from their soapboxes long enough to really look at what this law was saying, instead of hollering, "Just vaccinate your damn kids," from the rooftops, it wouldn't matter that some signatures are missing. It wouldn't matter that some petitions were invalidated. There would be enough signatures to make up for the fact that someone deliberately set out to sabotage this movement.
The SB277 Referendum was not about whether or not to inject kids with substances. It was about retaining freedom of choice, which is one of the foundations of this nation. Anyone who can't see that is a very sad individual. The fact that this movement was sabotaged in this way tells me there were people who were scared it would actually pass and they couldn't afford to let that happen.
Thanks a lot, Californians. You really blew it this time.